refactor(autojac): Factorize jacobian dict creation#609
Merged
ValerianRey merged 4 commits intomainfrom Mar 6, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
/opencode:Plan Can you review these changes? Anything to report? |
Contributor
|
This is a solid refactoring that cleanly deduplicates code. Here's my review: SummaryThe PR extracts 30+ lines of duplicated jacobian dict creation logic from both Changes Reviewed
Tests (
Assessment✅ No issues found - This is a clean deduplication that:
The refactoring is ready to merge. |
ValerianRey
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2026
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, nice catch! (CI will break until #611 is merged)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

This is mostly to test opencode, but I think it is valuable. I asked it to review the autojac package, it suggested that (with a little bit of back and forth between it and me), I like it, but we don't have to accept it.